Why does Seth Rogen's wife want to have sex

With Mike Cernovich?

Seth Rogen’s wife recently told me on Twitter that she would like to have sex with me. Setting aside the moral implications of such a decision, one might ask: Why?

Seth Rogen is famous. He’s a multi-millionaire. Clearly that’s not enough. Seth Rogen is lacking in all areas of his life that matter most, due to his weak mindset.

My guess is that the answer is: because he's a fat gamma male with less testosterone and muscle development than the average 14-year-old boy. Sure, he's funny, but have you ever noticed how much plainer the women who date and marry famous comedians are than the women who date much less famous actors and athletes?

It's because of their low socio-sexual rank, which is heavily influenced by mindset. Women like laughing at clowns, but they aren't particularly inclined to have sex with them. Of course, pictures can also be informative.

Let's face it, it's not surprising that Seth Rogen's wife might prefer the gentleman on the right. And I understand that he's still single for the moment, so perhaps if she acts fast... on second thought, I've met Shauna. She's full of smiles, but I have no doubt that she would, as they say on the mean streets of Orange County, "cut a bitch."

That being said, I am totally on Seth Rogen's side in all of this. While I am still bitter about having been subjected to one of his movies (I think it was Knocked Up), at least he's not responsible for me being stuck drinking beet roots and shredded oak leaves for lunch.

Never apologize on demand

Roosh underlines what I have been repeatedly telling everyone. NEVER APOLOGIZE to SJWs. It is like confessing a crime to the police; they won't forgive you, they will PROSECUTE you.

Back in September 2015, it was revealed that the two men who owned the Waking Life coffee shop in Asheville, NC were also running a blog that documented their sexual exploits with various women. They were immediately branded as being misogynists. Local feminists arranged a boycott and picketed the business. How the owners reacted and the subsequent fallout shows us the frightening parallels between methods of social justice warriors (SJW) and Marxist techniques....

Predictably, the cringing obsequiousness did not appease the SJW. Waking Life had to be closed in response to the furor. But rather than going down fighting, Rutledge and Owens prostrated themselves even lower to the SJW in their farewell posting, in which they again disown the manosphere and blame it for validating their “regrettable behavior.”

    Two and a half weeks ago, blogs, podcasts, and tweets which we ignorantly assumed would be kept anonymous were linked to us. We had made an effort to stay anonymous because at times we used demeaning, harsh, and violent words that expressed hatred and fear towards women. This anonymity allowed our words to knowingly bypass the checks and balances of the community in which we live, and avoid the reactions of real people. The red pill community provided us with validation and adoration as we engaged in this regrettable behavior.

They even submitted themselves to the two minutes of public hate. It sounds like a modern day version of the pillory.

    In the aftermath of us being identified… We felt lost, ashamed, and confused. A few key community members and friends showed up and gave us the opportunity to face the anger and pain we’d caused. To lean into it… We realized that we’d quantified and objectified living, breathing people. People who deserved much better. We’d used cruel words to belittle them and relieve our own insecurities and fears. We’d shared private memories that should have remained secret and sweet… We have discovered that some of it wasn’t about us, but was about a society-wide problem for which we’ve become the focal point.

They promised to continue to receive counseling to aid the “process” becoming model feminists and to become evangelists to the “red pill community.”

Women HATE HATE HATE weakness. Their demands were a public shit test, and the coffee shop guys could not have failed it more completely. They have been accordingly punished.

This explains a lot

Namely, why Western Europe is being overrun by unarmed Muslims while the heavily armed Islamic State is being simultaneously destroyed in Syria. I strongly suspect Russia could solve Western Europe's migration problem in an afternoon.

Female suffrage was bad enough. Turning national defense over to women is literally societal suicide.

Never date an SJW

And never, ever, even think about dating, or even talking to, an "anti-rape activist":

Meghan Warner, a senior at UC Berkeley, serves as the director of the university’s sexual-assault commission and is part of a federal complaint against the school for its mishandling of assault cases. She’s appeared in a Glamour issue honoring college women who are about to change the world. And she says there were men who wouldn’t approach her or date her after recognizing her, or learning of her work.

“Nobody ever explicitly said, ‘Oh you’re a survivor, we can’t date,’” she told me. “But they’d assume that I was just doing this for attention, or more frequently they didn’t want to deal with it. It was too much. They assumed I’d have a lot of needs.”

Then there were those who were a little too eager to make it know that they would never, ever assault a woman. “Their first response is ‘I’m not one of those guys, I would never do that,’” she said. “I mean, what, should I be carrying gold stars now?”

Chrissy Keenan, a UCLA senior, is the president of Bruin Consent Coalition, a campus group that works to raise awareness regarding sexual assault on campus. “When people know of me but they don’t really know the work, they hear the term ‘feminist’ or ‘sexual-violence prevention,’ they think, ‘super-extreme, bra-burning feminism,’” she explains, which often puts people on the defensive.

Keenan herself, though, sometimes finds it hard not to go on the offensive. She’s so used to laying down the nitty-gritty details of consent that she's been known to open romantic interactions with a spiel that feels straight out of a student handbook.

She animatedly tells a story about a recent Tinder rendezvous: “One time, I agreed to meet with this guy at 8 or 9 at night. Before we met, I said to him, ‘This is the work I do, I know the chief of police ... so, don't try and get creepy; I know all my rights.’ And five minutes later, he was like, ‘Actually, I'm really not OK with how you just assume I'm a bad guy. And I get very bad vibes from that, so we shouldn't hang out anymore.’”

Just black knight and eject. "I'm sorry, I need to leave RIGHT NOW. I don't want to talk-rape you."

When feminism isn't enough

Even feminist icons aren't safe from SJWs enforcing the latest narrative:

Alpha Mail: Alphas and N

TC rethinks his indifference to a woman's sexual history:

In the past I have never particularly cared about a woman’s N within a certain range of normal.  I Still don’t.  I don’t screw pornstars, but I also don’t meet any.  But within that context I simply don’t find a woman’s N count particularly bothersome at all, never have.  In spite of my 15 year marriage I still have a fairly high N count from before it and since, though keeping it up to date hasn’t been an issue for me since I was a kid.  And the way I think I might be an outlier in this area is that to my recollection, I can recall only 1 woman who didn’t say that sex with me was the very best she’s ever had. 

Now I know (have always known) you can’t believe what women say, particularly in that area.  And I typically don’t.  So although of course I take you at your word when you say that many men care deeply about a woman’s N count, even though I can’t really identify with it, I have to wonder if that concern isn’t some form of ego defense.   If you think that’s the case or not, that’s fine.  But in trying to reshape my view of the world to be more disciplined about game, I wonder if it is something I should be more concerned about now than I was in the past. 

I still entertain the idea of more children, and that will require commitment.  But I feel no moralists desire for a woman of past purity, and I’d make the call on a woman’s commitment worthiness on aspects other than N count.

I know enough about TC to know that he's not a Secret King. He's an Alpha with the conventional Alpha indifference to female promiscuity. I am similarly indifferent; whether a woman has 5 or 15 previous partners, that's just a rounding error from my perspective.

HOWEVER... what both Alphas and Sigmas tend to miss in their blithe sexual self-confidence is that what works when a man is single is not going to work so well in a marital relationship. The problem is that their single most reliable tool - NEXT - has been voluntarily removed from the toolbox. So, TC is wrong, both logically and empirically, to believe that a woman's N count is not the best proxy for her commitment-worthiness.

Delta Man: Don’t laugh

I was recently around a group of women who were really cutting it up, the problem was that none of their jokes were really funny. Of course some of the other guys dutifully laughed, because it’s polite to laugh at women’s jokes. Eventually the “leader” of the group mentioned something about me not finding them funny. I didn’t bother to respond. I had other things on my mind than their jokes so I seriously didn’t care about anything they were saying.

Suddenly the looks at me changed and I’m not just another guy in that place. So a word of advice, unless you are one on one and talking a girl up, don’t laugh unless the joke is funny.